• Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Conferences
  • Contact
  • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
  • Speaking

Coming Home

Dr. Gerard M. Nadal: Science in Service of the Pro-Life Movement

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Erin Manning: The War on Christmas
Rise Up Alaska! Protect Our Daughters! »

Montana Supreme Court Approves Physician Assisted Suicide

January 2, 2010 by Gerard M. Nadal

Montana has become the third state to approve physician-assisted suicide, after a divided State Supreme Court voted in a 5-3 ruling that said physician assisted suicide violates no laws . Read it here in the Christian Science Monitor.

As curtjester noted on a post below, once again it’s the courts doing the dirty work.

Death is sweetly seductive. We can so easily solve our most intractable problems by recourse to it. It requires no imagination, no imperative for scientific discovery, no advance in technology. It short-circuits the imperative to advance the science and art of palliative care. Excruciating suffering is not necessary at the end, execution even less so.

It’s the surrender of the smallest minds among us, and reminds us that all groups of humans will descend to the operational level of its smallest minds without vigilant leadership. It takes courage and vision, fortitude and skill to advance a civilization.

This ruling reminds us that the life issues will never be secured permanently. The mendacity of the cowardly is boundless.

As with all pro-death boilerplate, the label betrays the ignominious reality. Death with dignity isn’t. There is nothing dignified in the perversion of science and medicine, in physicians pulling double-duty as healer and executioner.

It isn’t enough to protest physician assisted suicide. We must demand that NIH fund research into pain management, that the government and medical schools fund departments and establish chairs of pain management, that graduate schools of Nursing do the same.

We must read Seduced By Death, by Herbert Hendin, a psychiatrist in favor of physician assisted suicide until he traveled to the Netherlands and saw their experiment in full throttle.

Above all, we must be prayerful warriors, relying on God’s grace to strengthen and empower us.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Biomedical Ethics, Dignity, Eugenics, Personhood, Physician Assisted Suicide | Tagged Death With Dignity, Montana, Physician Assisted Suicide | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on January 3, 2010 at 11:53 PM Siarlys Jenkins

    I sympathize with the woman who knew she had the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease, and wished to close out her life before she lost her personality. I really would not want anyone to go to prison for helping her. On the other hand, I know enough about the way the modern medical bureaucracy works, to understand that “talking to the family” as a means of emptying out a hospital bed that could be bringing in new revenue, among other abuses, is a very real hazard. Once allowed, it is all to easy to make it almost mandatory, or at least to exert overwhelming peer pressure in that direction.

    Here is what I am trying to formulate as a written instruction for my own medical care:

    If I am chronically incapable of giving informed consent for my own treatment, then there is to be no surgical intervention, no invasive procedure, no sustained use of IV or feeding tubes, or machine-assisted heart or lung functions. Don’t give me poison, but let nature take its course. No person is authorized by me to authorize such treatment, and I leave written instruction forbidding it.

    Absent medical technology, if my mind is gone, chances are I would succumb soon to some infection, or combination of infections, or one or more organs would give out. Let them. Do not prolong my life, lying in a bed, unable to respond to the world.

    I think that is both reasonable and morally defensible. I wouldn’t even have a problem with making it the default protocol in the absence of any instructions by the patient. Yes, among other things, it would save costs and lower everyone’s health insurance premiums, but it makes sense too. However, if the patient directs otherwise, I can find no moral basis for empowering anyone else to order that the plug be pulled against the patient’s wishes. It may be rational, but there is too much we don’t know and can never know. No social authority should second-guess the patient’s express wishes.


  2. on January 7, 2010 at 8:54 PM John Lofton, Recovering Republican

    FYI…might be interested in the radio show I did recently re: Dr.-Assisted Self-Murder in Montana;comments welcome.

    http://www.iotconline.com/radio/aview/TAV%20DrAsstMurder_Jan7.mp3

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com

    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution

    Host, “TheAmericanView” radio show

    Recovering Republican

    JLof@aol.com



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • May 2012 (6)
    • April 2012 (1)
    • March 2012 (11)
    • February 2012 (21)
    • January 2012 (5)
    • December 2011 (18)
    • November 2011 (3)
    • October 2011 (23)
    • September 2011 (24)
    • August 2011 (22)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (29)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (11)
    • March 2011 (18)
    • February 2011 (42)
    • January 2011 (26)
    • December 2010 (30)
    • November 2010 (34)
    • October 2010 (33)
    • September 2010 (16)
    • August 2010 (15)
    • July 2010 (7)
    • June 2010 (21)
    • May 2010 (33)
    • April 2010 (14)
    • March 2010 (41)
    • February 2010 (36)
    • January 2010 (59)
    • December 2009 (59)
  • Categories

    • Abortion (206)
    • Advent (23)
    • Biomedical Ethics (67)
    • Birth Control (43)
    • Bishops (53)
    • Black History Month (9)
    • Breast Cancer (63)
    • Christmas (21)
    • Cloning (2)
    • Condoms (16)
    • Darwin (2)
    • Development (6)
    • Dignity (105)
    • DNA (3)
    • Embryo Adoption (2)
    • Embryonic Stem Cell Research (6)
    • Eugenics (26)
    • Euthanasia (6)
    • Family (43)
    • Fathers of the Church (10)
    • Golden Coconut Award (3)
    • Health Care (12)
    • HIV/AIDS (4)
    • Infant Mortality (1)
    • IVF (2)
    • Lent (16)
    • Margaret Sanger (19)
    • Marriage (3)
    • Maternal Mortality (2)
    • Motherhood (12)
    • Neonates (1)
    • Personhood (19)
    • Physician Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Planned Parenthood (61)
    • Priests (50)
    • Pro-Life Academy (23)
    • Quotes (10)
    • Radio Interviews (3)
    • Right to Life (33)
    • Roots (1)
    • Sex Education (24)
    • Sexually Transmitted Disease (10)
    • Stem Cell Therapy (6)
    • Uncategorized (116)
  • Pages

    • About
    • BIO
    • Conferences
    • Contact
    • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
    • Speaking

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 433 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.