• Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Conferences
  • Contact
  • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
  • Speaking

Coming Home

Dr. Gerard M. Nadal: Science in Service of the Pro-Life Movement

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Peter, Paul and a New Evangelization
JOIN THE RALLY FOR MOTHER TERESA! »

Abortion ‘Triples Breast Cancer Risk’: Fourth Study Finds Terminations Linked to Disease

June 29, 2010 by Gerard M. Nadal

If anyone is inclined to support Breast Cancer Research, may I respectfully suggest that Karen Malec’s organization can get a much greater bang for the buck by getting the word out about PREVENTION. This is the message that the media will never divulge. This newsletter and related article are a must read.

Dear Friends:

The Daily Mail (London, England) published a very thoughtful article on the Sri Lankan study last week that found women with abortions more than triple their breast cancer risk. A link to the article is provided below.

Even though the Sri Lankan study, De Silva et al. 2010, was a small study of 100 breast cancer cases and 203 controls (health women), Professor Joel Brind (Baruch College, City University of New York) argues:

“It’s still a good study, just not quite as powerful. I would emphasize that it is typical of studies that have come out early in countries where breast cancer and abortion are not yet that common, like studies in the 1980′s in China, Japan, Australia and even the US: RR’s (relative risks) between 2 and 4, where the baseline lifetime incidence is closer to 2% rather than 10%. Once abortion is very common, the link is more like 1.1-1.5–relatively lower, but still impacting a similarly large number of women.”

In other words, in countries where abortion and breast cancer are still uncommon, scientists are able to detect that women with abortions multiply their breast cancer risk between two and four times. The fact that the study was conducted in a country where abortion and breast cancer are both uncommon is one of the strengths of the Sri Lankan study.

Once abortion and breast cancer become common, it becomes more challenging for scientists to detect large risk increases because it is harder to find a satisfactory control group of women who have never been exposed to abortion. In countries where abortion and breast cancer are common, scientists report lower relative risks, i.e. women with abortions multiply their risk of the disease by 1.1 to 1.5 times.

Please send us a donation today so we can help women in two African nations whose religious leaders have requested our literature and a video. Your assistance is urgently needed during the summer months.

Be sure to read the story in the Daily Mail below.

“Abortion ‘Triples Breast Cancer Risk’: Fourth Study Finds Terminations Linked to Disease”

Sincerely,
Karen Malec
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

Share this:

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Abortion, Breast Cancer | Tagged Abortion/Breast Cancer, Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, Sri Lankan Study | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on June 29, 2010 at 10:22 PM Abortion 'Triples Breast Cancer Risk': Fourth Study Finds …

    [...] See the original post here: Abortion 'Triples Breast Cancer Risk': Fourth Study Finds … [...]


  2. on June 30, 2010 at 6:59 AM L.

    FYI…just an aside, but while breast cancer is indeed quite uncommon in Japanese women, abortion is rampant here — and most likely very under-reported, because it’s not covered by national health insurance. Cash-paying patients + income tax-evading doctors = no reliable statistics.



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • May 2012 (8)
    • April 2012 (1)
    • March 2012 (11)
    • February 2012 (21)
    • January 2012 (5)
    • December 2011 (18)
    • November 2011 (3)
    • October 2011 (23)
    • September 2011 (24)
    • August 2011 (22)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (29)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (11)
    • March 2011 (18)
    • February 2011 (42)
    • January 2011 (26)
    • December 2010 (30)
    • November 2010 (34)
    • October 2010 (33)
    • September 2010 (16)
    • August 2010 (15)
    • July 2010 (7)
    • June 2010 (21)
    • May 2010 (33)
    • April 2010 (14)
    • March 2010 (41)
    • February 2010 (36)
    • January 2010 (59)
    • December 2009 (59)
  • Categories

    • Abortion (206)
    • Advent (23)
    • Biomedical Ethics (67)
    • Birth Control (43)
    • Bishops (54)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Breast Cancer (63)
    • Christmas (21)
    • Cloning (2)
    • Condoms (16)
    • Darwin (2)
    • Development (6)
    • Dignity (106)
    • DNA (3)
    • Embryo Adoption (2)
    • Embryonic Stem Cell Research (6)
    • Eugenics (26)
    • Euthanasia (6)
    • Family (43)
    • Fathers of the Church (10)
    • Golden Coconut Award (3)
    • Health Care (12)
    • HIV/AIDS (4)
    • Infant Mortality (1)
    • IVF (2)
    • Lent (16)
    • Margaret Sanger (19)
    • Marriage (3)
    • Maternal Mortality (2)
    • Motherhood (12)
    • Neonates (1)
    • Personhood (19)
    • Physician Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Planned Parenthood (61)
    • Priests (50)
    • Pro-Life Academy (23)
    • Quotes (10)
    • Radio Interviews (3)
    • Right to Life (33)
    • Roots (1)
    • Sex Education (24)
    • Sexually Transmitted Disease (10)
    • Stem Cell Therapy (6)
    • Uncategorized (117)
  • Pages

    • About
    • BIO
    • Conferences
    • Contact
    • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
    • Speaking

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 437 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.