• Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Conferences
  • Contact
  • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
  • Speaking

Coming Home

Dr. Gerard M. Nadal: Science in Service of the Pro-Life Movement

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pro-Life Nations Beat Pro-Abortion Ones on Maternal Mortality, New Report Shows
Second Theme of Advent »

The Breast Cancer-Abortion Link

December 17, 2009 by Gerard M. Nadal

A much-ignored story in science and medicine is the emerging body of data that suggests a link between abortion, contraception and breast cancer. It would seem that the ‘authorities’ have spoken and the matter is finished in their eyes. The American Cancer Society (ACS) and the National Cancer Institute have both published fact sheets to close the conversation on a growing body of literature to the contrary. This will be a recurring issue on this blog.

While future posts will treat the topic systematically, a solid beginning needs to be a critique of the critics.

At issue is the validity of two methodological approaches to the topic: Retrospective Studies and Prospective Studies.

Retrospective studies begin with women who have breast cancer and a similarly aged control group. Looking back, in retrospect, the women report their entire health history, including the use of oral contraceptives and having had abortion(s). A number of retrospective studies, linked above, have demonstrated an increased incidence of breast cancer in women who have had abortions. ACS claims that this is nothing more than, “Recall Bias”. That is to say, according to ACS:

“Studies have shown that healthy women are less likely to report that they have had induced abortions. In contrast, women with breast cancer are more likely to accurately report their reproductive histories. This may be because they are looking for anything that may be linked to the cancer.”

While this may be true in some other studies, it strains credulity to suggest that when asked directly women would somehow fail to recall an abortion. Presumably these studies employed what is known as social desirability scales to screen for respondents who might not be truthful in responding to such queries. Also, if healthy women fail to report induced abortions, how would the researchers know? If in those studies the researchers became aware of the past abortions in healthy women, why not in the retrospective studies dealing with breast cancer and abortion?

Prospective Studies are those that start with a group and follow them going forward. The great strength of a prospective study is that it eliminates recall bias. Two large prospective studies have been cited as indicating no link with abortion. However, as Joel Brind, Ph.D. properly points out in a critique published in Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, these studies did not follow the women long enough. One study concluded after only ten years. It usually takes cancer a minimum of fifteen years to develop. Brind’s critique of the methodological flaws in the NCI and ACS fact sheet conclusions is spot on.

With the methodological flaws of the prospective studies clearly exposed, this topic deserves much greater scrutiny.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Abortion, Breast Cancer | Tagged Abortion, Birth Control, Breast Cancer | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on December 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM Kate

    Thanks for explaining this. I’ve heard of studies in New Zealand and China showing association between breast cancer and abortion but have been largely ignored by the scientific community here. I now understand why.


  2. on December 28, 2009 at 5:16 PM Necdet Icten

    Thank you for writing this, I can not find an information which is so clear and through up to now.



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • January 2021 (7)
    • November 2020 (1)
    • May 2020 (2)
    • September 2019 (1)
    • May 2019 (2)
    • April 2019 (1)
    • February 2019 (1)
    • April 2018 (2)
    • January 2017 (1)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (10)
    • July 2016 (2)
    • June 2016 (1)
    • May 2016 (1)
    • April 2016 (1)
    • March 2016 (1)
    • February 2016 (3)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • November 2015 (2)
    • October 2015 (1)
    • September 2015 (1)
    • August 2015 (3)
    • April 2015 (1)
    • February 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (3)
    • November 2014 (1)
    • October 2014 (4)
    • September 2014 (15)
    • August 2014 (6)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (1)
    • April 2014 (2)
    • March 2014 (2)
    • February 2014 (1)
    • January 2014 (3)
    • December 2013 (17)
    • November 2013 (9)
    • October 2013 (12)
    • September 2013 (4)
    • July 2013 (2)
    • June 2013 (5)
    • May 2013 (2)
    • April 2013 (3)
    • March 2013 (6)
    • February 2013 (2)
    • January 2013 (1)
    • December 2012 (18)
    • November 2012 (6)
    • October 2012 (13)
    • September 2012 (1)
    • July 2012 (10)
    • June 2012 (13)
    • May 2012 (8)
    • April 2012 (1)
    • March 2012 (11)
    • February 2012 (21)
    • January 2012 (5)
    • December 2011 (18)
    • November 2011 (3)
    • October 2011 (23)
    • September 2011 (24)
    • August 2011 (22)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (29)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (11)
    • March 2011 (18)
    • February 2011 (42)
    • January 2011 (26)
    • December 2010 (30)
    • November 2010 (34)
    • October 2010 (33)
    • September 2010 (16)
    • August 2010 (15)
    • July 2010 (7)
    • June 2010 (21)
    • May 2010 (33)
    • April 2010 (14)
    • March 2010 (41)
    • February 2010 (36)
    • January 2010 (59)
    • December 2009 (59)
  • Categories

    • Abortion (258)
    • Advent (26)
    • Biomedical Ethics (82)
    • Birth Control (51)
    • Bishops (87)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Breast Cancer (65)
    • Christmas (26)
    • Cloning (4)
    • Condoms (16)
    • COVID-19 (1)
    • Darwin (2)
    • Development (6)
    • Dignity (119)
    • Divine Mercy Novenas (10)
    • DNA (3)
    • Embryo Adoption (2)
    • Embryonic Stem Cell Research (6)
    • Eugenics (29)
    • Euthanasia (8)
    • Family (44)
    • Fathers of the Church (11)
    • Fortnight for Freedom (1)
    • Golden Coconut Award (3)
    • Health Care (14)
    • HIV/AIDS (5)
    • Infant Mortality (2)
    • IVF (4)
    • Joseph (6)
    • Lent (17)
    • Margaret Sanger (19)
    • Marriage (6)
    • Maternal Mortality (2)
    • Motherhood (12)
    • Neonates (1)
    • Personhood (20)
    • Physician Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Planned Parenthood (64)
    • Priests (50)
    • Pro-Life Academy (23)
    • Quotes (10)
    • Radio Interviews (3)
    • Right to Life (34)
    • Roots (1)
    • Sex Education (25)
    • Sexually Transmitted Disease (12)
    • Stem Cell Therapy (7)
    • Transgender (1)
    • Uncategorized (205)
  • Pages

    • About
    • BIO
    • Conferences
    • Contact
    • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
    • Speaking

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: