• Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Conferences
  • Contact
  • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
  • Speaking

Coming Home

Dr. Gerard M. Nadal: Science in Service of the Pro-Life Movement

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pro-Life Academy. Biology: Cells (I)
When Scientists Lie: The Breast Cancer-Abortion Link Held Hostage »

Of Cardinals, Cathedrals, Condoms and Cretins (Part IV)

January 14, 2010 by Gerard M. Nadal

John Cardinal O'Connor

WARNING: The subject matter in this post deals candidly with sexually transmitted infections and diseases and their modes of transmission. Minors and persons easily upset by the nature of such discussion are advised to skip over this post.

Cretins. No other word better encompasses those who set their sights on John Cardinal O’Connor and the American Catholic Hierarchy for their refusal to advocate condom usage as a means of attenuating the impact of HIV/AIDS, especially in light of the steady news stories published in The New York Times during those years. What other word encompasses a whole movement of people who reject Apostolic Authority, distort the plain meaning of the Scriptural injunctions against homosexual and extramarital sex, and then disrupt Mass and desecrate the Blessed Sacrament and a cathedral all because the Apostolic Successors would not bend to their will?

What word better encompasses a group who divested themselves and their community of any personal responsibility for their sexual behavior and its consequences, projecting onto Rome all culpability? Narcissist describes a great deal, but is insufficient when one considers the venom spit at the Church.

As has been demonstrated conclusively in Part I, Part II and Part III, these people had it wrong. Terribly wrong. Tragically wrong. In the early days of the pandemic, gays were being told to lubricate their condoms to facilitate intercourse and reduce strain on the condom which might cause rupture.

Then they figured out that petroleum jellies dissolved the latex, presumably after more disease was transmitted through those condom ruptures.

Then, unthinking, untrained and uncritical activists led the charge for using nonoxynol-9 (N-9), the spermicide that was shown to kill HIV in test tubes (In high doses, a fact they missed), as a lubricant to back up condom efficay, should the condom slip or tear. For whatever reason, it wouldn’t be until several years later that N-9 would be shown to be completely ineffective against the virus in the low concentration used on condoms, and causes ulcerations in the vaginal and rectal mucosa, actually facilitating HIV transmission in case of condom failure.

Were all of that not enough, Part III presented CDC’s own data on condom ineffectiveness.

Seldom in the history of medicine has a movement been so vocal, so organized, and so catastrophically wrong. The public health community has done a slow walk back from those early days of ACT-UP’s message of certitude.

They have abandoned “Safe” sex for the more qualified “Safer” sex.

They have abandoned advocating N-9 as both lubricant and fail-safe.

They have all but abandoned the condom as effective against much of anything in the way of STI’s.

They have embraced the language of abstinence and long-term mutual monogamy as the surest ways of preventing STI’s, including HIV.

In presenting themselves as the true shepherds of the sexually licentious in the face of a killer disease, in establishing the corollary narrative that the Bishops were out of touch old celibates consigned to history’s dustbin, ACT-UP and their fellow travelers no doubt unwittingly led scores of thousands to HIV infection and death.

Theirs is a bitter, shameful legacy.

The Bishops for their part spared no expense in creating hospital and nursing home beds for AIDS patients and received them with compassion. One of those leaders of the desecration converted to the Catholic Church on his death bed and entered eternity sealed with the sacraments. The Bishops would not be swayed by the bad PR, and stayed faithful to their Church, their Office and their God.

It is Cardinal O’Connor’s message that the science has borne out:

“Good morality is good medicine.”

(The promised article on abstinence is itself a new series entitled, “Abstinence Education (Part I)”

Share this:

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Bishops, Condoms, HIV/AIDS, Sex Education | Tagged ACT-UP, Bishops, Condoms, HIV/AIDS | 8 Comments

8 Responses

  1. on January 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM Siarlys Jenkins

    A lot of good points here. Narcissism is a good word to apply. There have been, in American history, a number of atrocious uses of state power to impose utterly irrational, but sometimes lucrative, prejudices of one interest group upon another, or to set up petty tyrants to indulge in narrow-minded rule over their own little bailiwicks. Making the most general use possible of the language developed in a number of justifiable struggles, in the courts and on the street, against these prejudices and arbitrary acts, various people have developed the following untenable logic:

    1) I should have whatever I want.
    2) The State should not punish me for it.
    3) Nobody should intimidate me about it.
    4) There should be no material consequences for my choices, not from nature, not from God, not from anything at all.
    5) If you tell me there are real consequences, you are a bigot, and you don’t like me.

    We can restrain the exercise of state power, we can restrain the use of other concentrations of power, such as the use of irrelevent prejudice in employment decisions, but life is real, and if you can’t deal with that, nobody can help you.

    Those who believe condoms will do them some good have every legal right to use them. Those who believe condoms will do more harm than good have every right to say so. For any group to set their sites on someone because their target declines to ADVOCATE for what the group believes is ludicrous. It is the intellectual and moral equivalent of the Spanish Inquisition, although without the raw power to systematically execute thousands of people. Cardinal O’Connor has no obligation to agree with anyone or anything on any matter, just because they believe they are right. If he wants to be a Cardinal, he has an obligation to his church, but he chose to enter the priesthood.

    Who knows? The church’s way may actually save more lives. Or it may not. That’s one reason we have free speech and fifty state governments and voluntary association in this country. Let everyone who thinks they have a good idea offer it, in public, and let people choose. It is a good thing that the Roman church offers an alternative. If it doesn’t work, people don’t have to follow it. Individuals who want to put petroleum jelly on condoms, or put N-9 on condoms, or use condoms without lubricant, or engage in sexual intercourse without condoms, are free to do so.

    It is of course irrefutable that any two individuals who engage in monogamous sexual intercourse, neither of whom had an STD when they began, and neither of whom violates their mutual commitment, will never be infected by an STD. The church didn’t invent that fact, it was observable when the first moral laws began to appear in human cultures. For that matter, if fifty people with no STD among them maintained the discipline and integrity to engage in random promiscuous sex only within the group, and nobody violated that discipline, none of them would be infected by an STD either. It seems nobody has ever assembled a group of fifty people who could reliably maintain such discipline.

    I myself reject Apostolic authority. That doesn’t give me the right to interrupt a service filled with people who have voluntarily chosen to accept it, assembled in a building paid for by the voluntary donations of people who have accepted it. It’s a free country.


  2. on January 15, 2010 at 5:17 AM USMC Rev

    Good points and info doctor. Consider including a disclaimer/warning at the beginning of each of your posts to this thread to advise parents and younger readers on the mature nature of the material. Just a thought.


  3. on January 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM Gerard M. Nadal

    Thanks Rev.

    Done it!


  4. on May 4, 2010 at 4:20 AM John Cardinal O’Connor 10 Years Later: A Saint ? (Part I) « Coming Home

    […] Part I Part II Part III Part IV […]


  5. on October 25, 2010 at 5:39 PM Of Cardinals, Cathedrals, Condoms, and Cretins (Part III) « Coming Home

    […] Part II of this series (Part I here. Part II here. Part IV here.) we examined the disconnect between ACT-UP’s rhetoric on condoms and the published reports in […]


  6. on October 25, 2010 at 7:12 PM Of Cardinals, Cathedrals, Condoms, and Cretins (Part II) « Coming Home

    […] Read Part I, <strong>Part III, Part IV. […]


  7. on October 26, 2010 at 7:03 AM Of Cardinals, Cathedrals, Condoms, and Cretins (Part I) « Coming Home

    […] Part II here. Part III here. Part IV here. […]


  8. on October 26, 2010 at 11:20 PM jmgwk

    As often is the case, I am so glad to see the information you provide. Oh, if only people would be willing to read, understand and consider it. If only young people could know this…



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • June 2022 (1)
    • May 2022 (1)
    • July 2021 (1)
    • January 2021 (7)
    • November 2020 (1)
    • May 2020 (2)
    • September 2019 (1)
    • May 2019 (2)
    • April 2019 (1)
    • February 2019 (1)
    • April 2018 (2)
    • January 2017 (1)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (10)
    • July 2016 (2)
    • June 2016 (1)
    • May 2016 (1)
    • April 2016 (1)
    • March 2016 (1)
    • February 2016 (3)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • November 2015 (2)
    • October 2015 (1)
    • September 2015 (1)
    • August 2015 (3)
    • April 2015 (1)
    • February 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (3)
    • November 2014 (1)
    • October 2014 (4)
    • September 2014 (15)
    • August 2014 (6)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (1)
    • April 2014 (2)
    • March 2014 (2)
    • February 2014 (1)
    • January 2014 (3)
    • December 2013 (17)
    • November 2013 (9)
    • October 2013 (12)
    • September 2013 (4)
    • July 2013 (2)
    • June 2013 (5)
    • May 2013 (2)
    • April 2013 (3)
    • March 2013 (6)
    • February 2013 (2)
    • January 2013 (1)
    • December 2012 (18)
    • November 2012 (6)
    • October 2012 (13)
    • September 2012 (1)
    • July 2012 (10)
    • June 2012 (13)
    • May 2012 (8)
    • April 2012 (1)
    • March 2012 (11)
    • February 2012 (21)
    • January 2012 (5)
    • December 2011 (18)
    • November 2011 (3)
    • October 2011 (23)
    • September 2011 (24)
    • August 2011 (22)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (29)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (11)
    • March 2011 (18)
    • February 2011 (42)
    • January 2011 (26)
    • December 2010 (30)
    • November 2010 (34)
    • October 2010 (33)
    • September 2010 (16)
    • August 2010 (15)
    • July 2010 (7)
    • June 2010 (21)
    • May 2010 (33)
    • April 2010 (14)
    • March 2010 (41)
    • February 2010 (36)
    • January 2010 (59)
    • December 2009 (59)
  • Categories

    • Abortion (258)
    • Advent (26)
    • Biomedical Ethics (82)
    • Birth Control (51)
    • Bishops (87)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Breast Cancer (65)
    • Christmas (26)
    • Cloning (4)
    • Condoms (16)
    • COVID-19 (1)
    • Darwin (2)
    • Development (6)
    • Dignity (119)
    • Divine Mercy Novenas (10)
    • DNA (3)
    • Embryo Adoption (2)
    • Embryonic Stem Cell Research (6)
    • Eugenics (29)
    • Euthanasia (8)
    • Family (44)
    • Fathers of the Church (11)
    • Fortnight for Freedom (1)
    • Golden Coconut Award (3)
    • Health Care (14)
    • HIV/AIDS (5)
    • Infant Mortality (2)
    • IVF (4)
    • Joseph (6)
    • Lent (17)
    • Margaret Sanger (19)
    • Marriage (6)
    • Maternal Mortality (2)
    • Motherhood (12)
    • Neonates (1)
    • Personhood (20)
    • Physician Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Planned Parenthood (64)
    • Priests (50)
    • Pro-Life Academy (23)
    • Quotes (10)
    • Radio Interviews (3)
    • Right to Life (34)
    • Roots (1)
    • Sex Education (25)
    • Sexually Transmitted Disease (12)
    • Stem Cell Therapy (7)
    • Transgender (1)
    • Uncategorized (208)
  • Pages

    • About
    • BIO
    • Conferences
    • Contact
    • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
    • Speaking

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Coming Home
    • Join 857 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Coming Home
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: