Today’s Gospel:
Matthew 3:1-12
In due course John the Baptist appeared; he preached in the wilderness of Judaea and this was his message: ‘Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is close at hand.’ This was the man the prophet Isaiah spoke of when he said:
A voice cries in the wilderness:
Prepare a way for the Lord,
make his paths straight.
This man John wore a garment made of camel-hair with a leather belt round his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem and all Judaea and the whole Jordan district made their way to him, and as they were baptised by him in the river Jordan they confessed their sins. But when he saw a number of Pharisees and Sadducees coming for baptism he said to them, ‘Brood of vipers, who warned you to fly from the retribution that is coming? But if you are repentant, produce the appropriate fruit, and do not presume to tell yourselves, “We have Abraham for our father,” because, I tell you, God can raise children for Abraham from these stones. Even now the axe is laid to the roots of the trees, so that any tree which fails to produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown on the fire. I baptise you in water for repentance, but the one who follows me is more powerful than I am, and I am not fit to carry his sandals; he will baptise you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing-fan is in his hand; he will clear his threshing-floor and gather his wheat into the barn; but the chaff he will burn in a fire that will never go out.’
Fire. It is an inescapable reality for humanity. We can either embrace the Baptism of Fire from the Lord, or burn with the fire of loneliness, isolation, and despair for all of eternity. One way or the other, it seems, we will burn within. The Baptism of Fire is the purging within of all that is dross. The fire is the fire of love of God. Our love drives us to purify ourselves by cooperating with grace. We cannot do it alone, as salvation is the work of God, not man. That’s why John speaks of the baptisms of water, Holy Spirit, and fire. They are all the work of God in our lives, requiring us to open ourselves to learning authentic love.
John also speaks of Jesus separating the wheat from the chaff: the life-containing kernel that is at once food and source of new life from the indigestible and useless outer shell and husk. The ancient techniques of winnowing wheat from chaff are still used today. Toss the wheat in he air and allow the breeze to blow away the useless and papery chaff, as the dense kernels drop straight down. What an apt analogy.
The chaff of humanity are driven by their passions and narcissistic impulses as chaff in the wind. They never learn love, which is sacrificial and other-oriented. And that brings me to what has always intuitively rubbed me raw about radical feminism.
It is all about the self. I recall the 70’s and 80’s when I read Brown, Gilligan, de Beauvoir, Friedan, and the rest of the gang. It always impressed me as a profoundly sad and loveless existece. They were right to decry the denigration hurled at them, and the flippant suggestion that they be good little home makers. However, their response was murderous rage, and 53 million babies in this country have been slain in the name of women’s rights, of economic advancement and educational advancement of women. It’s been all “rights” and no “responsibilities”.
It’s been the fire of vengeance, and it must be brought to an end.
Looking beyond our shores, the only rights that I have ever seen the radical feminists arguing for are the rights of third world women to slaughter their babies in the womb. U.S. aid is consistently tied to demands for “comprehensive” birth control in these nations. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I’ve never seen the radical feminists go after the Isamic leaders who keep women down with Sharia law.
I’ve never seen them lead the charge against the tin horn dictators who gorge themselves on US aid, and preside over the servile treatment of women.
I’ve never seen the UN and the feminists attempt to tie financial aid to the development of education for women and the creation of more just working conditions for women.
Just abortion and birth control.
Nihilism: nonexistence and slaughter.
The ice-cold absence of love. The hatred of nurture.
If we are to prepare the way of the Lord, we must begin by looking within, first. Then we must do what love demands, we must speak out for the poor and the least. We must champion those who have no champion, lest love collapse on itself into selfishness and narcissism. Today’s Gospel makes it clear.
We are all going to burn with one of two fires; love or despair. While we live, the choice remains ours.
“I’ve never seen the UN and the feminists attempt to tie financial aid to the development of education for women and the creation of more just working conditions for women.”
“Just abortion and birth control.”
Have you ever seen ANY feminist protest the forced abortions in China? Nope.
It took a MALE scientist, Dr. Steven Mosher to uncover and protest that injustice. Meanwhile the entire West does nothing even when we now have videos of women weeping in sorrow over their murdered children…..
Abortion rights are sacrosanct. As is contraception.
it’s one thing to down a pill every day or walk into an abortion clinic on your own legs and be willing to accept that lie for yourself.
it’s quite another to spread that lie to others.
Until we as God’s people clean up our act and are willing to live how He has asked us. (with brotherly “selfless” love.) Until we turn in repentance. (Psm. 80: 3, 7, 11, 14) Cling, abide to the Vine. Weep with Rachel over our lost children.
Then we will see his shining blazing glory. Repent, and don’t quench the convicting work of His Spirit.
Come Lord Jesus, come.
I’m not even sure where to start here. Are there really ANY feminists who think forced abortions are a good idea? I have never met any, or heard of any.
I read (and have contributed) to feminist blogs, and they’re full of posts like this: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=401176579802
And once again, you are forgetting “Feminists for Life.” Or don’t they count as “real” feminists?
http://www.feministsforlife.org/
And why are you complaining about “radical” feminists, Dr. Nadal? The radical extremes of ANY group of thought are by definition not the mainstream.
You don’t have to support abortion rights to be a feminist. I repeat, you don’t have to support abortion rights to be a feminist.
I do not speak as a pro-life feminist myself, but believe me, there are plenty, because feminism is NOT just about abortion.
Even Hillary Clinton has been speaking out against forced China’s abortions for years — and she’s a bona fide “no-friend-of-the-fetus” pro-abort feminist if ever there was one:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/hillary-clinton-urges-president-bush-to-discuss-forced-abortion-on-china-tr
Notice I didn’t leap to the defence of the United Nations, which I agree has a lot of answering to do: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/when-it-comes-to-women-the-un-flogs-its-own-integrity/article1795708/
L,
the problem is that one doesn’t have to go to China to see forced abortions.
There are many examples in the US of women being forcibly aborted – young girls being led into clinics in an obvious state of terror and being aborted
There are also many examples of women who are on the table and who tell the doctor to stop and he/she simply proceeds with the abortion.
It’s a matter of money and ideology. Both are very strong drivers of the so called “choice” of abortion.
I don’t doubt that forced abortions occur everywhere, human nature being what it is. And I also think that it’s impossible to get completely reliable statistics on it — just as it’s impossible to get reliable statistics on how many pregnancies result from rape, since not many of them are reported.
I once saw a statistic that over 60% of U.S. abortions were “forced.” Reading further, I realized this included women who were “forced by circumstances” — lack of resources to support themselves, lack of family support, etc. This is very different from extortion/coercion, and could be remedied in part by changing society’s views on unplanned pregnancies.
A very sad case was that of a woman from a fiercely pro-life family, who viewed pre-marital sex as deeply shameful and believed all babies born to unwed mothers should be given up by the birth mothers to be adopted by Christian parents. (They weren’t Catholic — they were evangelical Christians — but I have known plenty of Catholics with this opinion.) When this young woman got pregnant, she had an abortion to save her family the shame — she said she wanted to take the sin entirely on her soul, and spare her family.
Most of the women I know who didn’t abort, and instead had their babies and raised them, were from Hispanic cultures and had supportive families whose attitude was, “Well, you made a mistake, but we will greet this baby as a blessing.”
Hey, Gerard, would you read this working paper?
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1557503
Will Do.