• Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Conferences
  • Contact
  • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
  • Speaking

Coming Home

Dr. Gerard M. Nadal: Science in Service of the Pro-Life Movement

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Catholic Bishop Right to Push Back Against Culture of Death
Coming Home’s Top Ten Posts of 2010 »

Repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and the Law of Unintended Consequences

December 29, 2010 by Gerard M. Nadal

Father Steven E. Clark


The repeal of DADT will have far-reaching repercussions for the military chaplaincy, and makes the only acceptable expressions of morality those which are consistent with the provisions within Uniform Code of Military Justice. Father Steven Clark has an excellent letter in today’s Journal News. He speaks with a unique voice of authority.

As a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and now a member of the clergy, in my opinion the striking down of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy for the Armed Forces will have negative consequences on the free exercise of religion for many members of the military and, more specifically, on the chaplain corps of all services. Our senators, representatives and president in one bill have struck at the very heart of the constitutional guarantee of the free exercise of religion.

What will happen to Christian, Jewish and Muslim chaplains who adhere to traditional moral teaching based on their holy scriptures and teach that homosexual activity is immoral? What will happen to chaplains who are no longer allowed to deliver sermons, homilies and teachings counter to accepted military policy when dealing with homosexual activity of service members? Will they be disciplined, prosecuted or discharged? Will their respective religious authorities call them home in order to protect them from either compromising their beliefs or prosecution by military authorities? Who will then serve the troops in their respective faith groups? This is a potential constitutional disaster the magnitude of which the members of Congress and our president seem to have not considered — or did they and just don’t care?

This does not bode well for our constitutional guarantee of the free exercise of religion and specifically for a chaplain corps whose active duty numbers have shrunk to a point that present-day billets go unfilled.

The Rev. Steven Clark

Mount Kisco

The writer is pastor of St. Francis of Assisi Church in Mount Kisco.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged DADT, Father Steven Clark, Military Chaplains | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on December 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM Lisa Mladinich

    It’s hard to say whether they care or not. It’s awful to think our government might really intend to destroy the religious presence in the military. It has such dark implications. But even apart from that possibility, I look at what has happened in Canada, with homosexual rights groups gaining so much power that clerics who refuse to bow to pressure and speak out on moral issues, refuse to marry them or promote their issues are fined or jailed. It’s just shocking what a slippery slope this forced “tolerance” becomes. It becomes the worst kind of persecution — dishonest and self-congratulatory. My dad was a Naval officer for many years and knew many homosexual officers and enlisted personnel. He said it was never an issue, never a problem, because their private lives were their own and not a public issue. I really think this chaplain is hitting it right on the head with his concerns, and I think the Canadian model proves him right, sadly. May God have mercy on this dear country of ours, where religious freedoms are threatened by the government that was set up to protect them.


  2. on December 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM Gerard M. Nadal

    Lisa,

    The agenda is simple. If we do not embrace homophilia, we are accused of homophobia.


  3. on December 31, 2010 at 8:39 AM Scott W.

    Lawrence Auster has an entry here about conservatives lying down and proclaiming they were always ok with the repeal: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018280.html

    I bring that up because I recall when pro-lifers were told that we HAD to nominate Bush because otherwise that monster McCain would get it. Then we were told we HAD to vote for the former monster McCain because otherwise an even bigger monster Obama would win.

    This is what is becoming known as the Hegelian Mambo: Many steps left and an occasional step right. Eventually one has to stop dancing to the neo-con tune.


  4. on December 31, 2010 at 9:33 AM Gerard M. Nadal

    Gentles All,

    I’ll do my best to respond, however, last night I was called and informed that my Aunt (also Godmother) has taken a precipitous and unexpected decline and has only a day or two left to live. I’m leaving now to join my family, but will be checking in. God Bless.


  5. on December 31, 2010 at 8:44 PM barboo77

    I have mixed feelings about DADT. On on hand, I don’t want it to become an issue like you describe where chaplains are punished for upholding the doctrines of their faith.

    On the other hand I once heard a priest military chaplain talking about the rise in military suicides since the institution of DADT because if a soldier with homosexual feelings went for counseling to a military chaplain or therapist that chaplain or therapist was required to report the soldier.


  6. on January 3, 2011 at 6:35 AM L.

    What will happen to Christian, Jewish and Muslim chaplains who adhere to traditional moral teaching based on their holy scriptures and teach that homosexual activity is immoral?

    Gee, I imagine that they will go the way of Jewish and Muslim chaplains who adhere to traditional moral teaching based on their holy scriptures and teach that any sexual activity outside of marriage is immoral.

    Adultery and fornication are legal (and thank god for the latter!), and this doesn’t mean religions are required to promote them.


  7. on January 4, 2011 at 3:16 PM Gerard M. Nadal

    To the person who asked me to delete the two comments being held for approval, it’s done.



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • January 2021 (7)
    • November 2020 (1)
    • May 2020 (2)
    • September 2019 (1)
    • May 2019 (2)
    • April 2019 (1)
    • February 2019 (1)
    • April 2018 (2)
    • January 2017 (1)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (10)
    • July 2016 (2)
    • June 2016 (1)
    • May 2016 (1)
    • April 2016 (1)
    • March 2016 (1)
    • February 2016 (3)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • November 2015 (2)
    • October 2015 (1)
    • September 2015 (1)
    • August 2015 (3)
    • April 2015 (1)
    • February 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (3)
    • November 2014 (1)
    • October 2014 (4)
    • September 2014 (15)
    • August 2014 (6)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (1)
    • April 2014 (2)
    • March 2014 (2)
    • February 2014 (1)
    • January 2014 (3)
    • December 2013 (17)
    • November 2013 (9)
    • October 2013 (12)
    • September 2013 (4)
    • July 2013 (2)
    • June 2013 (5)
    • May 2013 (2)
    • April 2013 (3)
    • March 2013 (6)
    • February 2013 (2)
    • January 2013 (1)
    • December 2012 (18)
    • November 2012 (6)
    • October 2012 (13)
    • September 2012 (1)
    • July 2012 (10)
    • June 2012 (13)
    • May 2012 (8)
    • April 2012 (1)
    • March 2012 (11)
    • February 2012 (21)
    • January 2012 (5)
    • December 2011 (18)
    • November 2011 (3)
    • October 2011 (23)
    • September 2011 (24)
    • August 2011 (22)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (29)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (11)
    • March 2011 (18)
    • February 2011 (42)
    • January 2011 (26)
    • December 2010 (30)
    • November 2010 (34)
    • October 2010 (33)
    • September 2010 (16)
    • August 2010 (15)
    • July 2010 (7)
    • June 2010 (21)
    • May 2010 (33)
    • April 2010 (14)
    • March 2010 (41)
    • February 2010 (36)
    • January 2010 (59)
    • December 2009 (59)
  • Categories

    • Abortion (258)
    • Advent (26)
    • Biomedical Ethics (82)
    • Birth Control (51)
    • Bishops (87)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Breast Cancer (65)
    • Christmas (26)
    • Cloning (4)
    • Condoms (16)
    • COVID-19 (1)
    • Darwin (2)
    • Development (6)
    • Dignity (119)
    • Divine Mercy Novenas (10)
    • DNA (3)
    • Embryo Adoption (2)
    • Embryonic Stem Cell Research (6)
    • Eugenics (29)
    • Euthanasia (8)
    • Family (44)
    • Fathers of the Church (11)
    • Fortnight for Freedom (1)
    • Golden Coconut Award (3)
    • Health Care (14)
    • HIV/AIDS (5)
    • Infant Mortality (2)
    • IVF (4)
    • Joseph (6)
    • Lent (17)
    • Margaret Sanger (19)
    • Marriage (6)
    • Maternal Mortality (2)
    • Motherhood (12)
    • Neonates (1)
    • Personhood (20)
    • Physician Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Planned Parenthood (64)
    • Priests (50)
    • Pro-Life Academy (23)
    • Quotes (10)
    • Radio Interviews (3)
    • Right to Life (34)
    • Roots (1)
    • Sex Education (25)
    • Sexually Transmitted Disease (12)
    • Stem Cell Therapy (7)
    • Transgender (1)
    • Uncategorized (205)
  • Pages

    • About
    • BIO
    • Conferences
    • Contact
    • Follow Gerard on FB & Twitter
    • Speaking

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
    %d bloggers like this: