PP Abortions in Thousands, 1969-2009
Here are Planned Parenthood’s own numbers. They reflect their activity in the abortion arena. As one can see, they are increasingly invested in performing this gruesome procedure.
Baby Boomers: These are the children who never were born, who will never pay the taxes we’ll need to sustain us in our retirement; these and the others totaling 53 million lost citizens.
And we let it happen. We’ll do well to remember that during euthanasia’s ascendancy.
1969 0
1970 100
1971 500
1972 1,000
1973 5,000
1974 10,000
1975 20,000
1976 40,000
1977 58,660
1978 70,000
1979 67,000
1980 60,000
1981 79,997
1982 80,000
1983 85,242
1984 88,824
1985 91,065
1986 98,638
1987 104,411
1988 111,189
1989 122,191
1990 129,155
1991 132,314
1992 130,844
1993 134,277
1994 133,289
1995 139,899
1996 153,367
1997 165,174
1998 168,509
1999 182,792
2000 197,070
2001 213,026
2002 230,630
2003 244,628
2004 255,015
2005 264,943
2006 289,750
2007 305,310
2008 324,008
2009 332,278
Coming Home 
Horrifying and disgusting! There’s no other way to describe it.
Could someone explain to me why my tax dollars are subsidizing this genocide?
Leticia,
NO! Just shut up and pay your taxes! (I’ll call you guys later today)
One of those “statistics” in 1990 was my grand-daughter Lauren who survived a first trimester abortion at the Houston Planned Parenthood abortuary. Amidst the endless stream of mothers who entered with a child and left without one, my daughter left with hers intact. They did not know that a Divine Physician stayed the hand of the abortionist at that moment and a life was spared.
I’ve always wanted to find a similar chart showing the incidence of breast cancer for women of child bearing age for the same time period. I bet, that side by side, there would be a significant correlation.
simply unbelievable Patricia!
MaryG,
Since 1996, abortion has more than doubled, which is very unfortunate. During this same period, however, breast cancer rates have been dropping by approximately 2% per year. Nonetheless, that by itself doesn’t exclude the possibility that abortion may lead to higher risk of breast cancer in certain groups of women. In other words, such correlations can be helpful but do not answer the question definitively. Also, I wouldn’t limit such a chart to cancers in women of childbearing age, because cancer due to such an exposure as abortion may take several years to develop. Anyway, it was an interesting idea.