My friend, Reggie Littlejohn, is the founder and president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers. She has issued the following press release under the title:
Despite Recent Reports, Chinese Government Has Not Banned Forced Abortion.
Reggie has an outstanding track record when it comes to accuracy and integrity, so I thought I would pass on the press release. It’s merits serious consideration.
On September 13, All Girls Allowed (AGA) sent out a press release with the bold title, “Chinese Government Bans Forced Abortion.” We wish we could agree with our colleagues at AGA. Unfortunately, this time, we cannot.
AGA’s claim that “the Chinese Government issued a document to Family Planning offices that bans forced abortion and sterilization” is based on links to two Chinese documents and a call to a family planning official in Chonqing City. The press release states, “What the officer in Chonqing said was incredible. Not only did they ban forced abortion, but the change came from the top down: “Earlier the government issued a document to all family planning committees,” he said. “Everyone has received it.” (Emphasis in original.) The AGA press release touted this statement as “a major change” and stated, with respect to the One Child Policy, “its days are numbered.”
Women’s Rights Without Frontiers has no doubt that forced abortions continue to happen at this very moment in China. When the message goes out that this is no longer happening, it undermines the movement to stop it.
Considering the facts set forth in the AGA press release, WRWF reaches the opposite conclusion: The Chinese Government has NOT BANNED forced abortion. Until proven otherwise, we believe that any rhetoric generated by the Chinese Communist Party ostensibly banning forced abortion is propaganda designed to deflect the heat generated by the notorious forced abortion at seven months of Feng Jianmei in June 2012. Here’s why:
1) Forced abortion has long been officially “banned” in China, yet it happens all the time.
In January 2011, Chinese President Hu Jintao told Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen that China has no forced abortion policy, yet numerous cases of forced abortion have surfaced since that time. In addition, Article 4 of The Population and Family Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China already protects against forced abortion. It states that Family Planning Officials shall “enforce the law in a civil manner, and they may not infringe upon legitimate rights and interests of citizens.”
http://www.gov.cn/english/laws/2005-10/11/content_75954.htm
This law is not worth the paper it is written on. Many credible reports of forced abortion have surfaced since this law was promulgated in 2002. To see examples from 2012, read WRWF’s Complaint to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women. http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/blog/?p=717
2) The documents cited in the AGA press release do not support the conclusion that the Chinese government has banned forced abortion.
Both documents mention a ban on late-term forced abortion only. They are silent on early and mid-term forced abortion, and therefore do not ban such forced abortions. Further, both documents take the position that late-term abortions must be voluntary. The Chinese Communist Party, however, already insists that abortions must be “voluntary,” and forced abortion is still practiced. In April 2012, for example, Pan Chunyan was grabbed out of her grocery store and forced to place her thumbprint on a document authorizing her abortion at eight months of pregnancy. Does this count as “voluntary” under the Policy?
These documents do not cite any penalty for breaking the “ban” on forced abortion. Nor do these documents discuss what will happen to women who are more than six months pregnant, but who cannot or will not pay the often impossible fines. To the contrary, both documents extol the virtues of the One Child Policy.
To read English translations of these documents, either see the attached documents or click on this link and scroll down to the bottom. http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/blog/?p=758
3) The documents cited in the AGA press release do not remove the financial or structural incentives that keep forced abortion in place.
The often excessive fines paid by couples to save an “out of plan” pregnancy are used to feather the pockets of family planning and other officials. These fines can reach up to ten times a person’s annual salary. Job loss is another form of financial coercion and can be catastrophic. In March 2012, the head of the Chemistry Department at Renmin University in Beijing jumped to his death because he was accused of having a second child and threatened with being “discharged from public employment.” Meanwhile, officials are promoted or demoted based on whether they meet birth, abortion and sterilization quotas.
Professor Commits Suicide Over Violating China’s One-Child Policy
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/china-news/professor-commits-suicide-for-violating-china-s-one-child-policy-272556.html
Jackie Sheehan, “Cruel Cut,” South China Morning Post, 7/25/12
http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/blog/?p=752
Clicking the “read more” link on the AGA press release and scrolling down will reveal that the release eventually mentions the fact that the documents cited are silent on the issue of early and mid-term forced abortions, and do not address the issue of “huge fines” as a form of coercion. These nuances, however, were predictably lost in the blast of the sensational headline.
Conclusion
WRWF agrees that pressure is mounting to end forced abortion in China. However, to announce that the Chinese government has already banned it is, in our opinion, premature and inaccurate. We need to keep the pressure on, not celebrate propaganda designed to take the pressure off.
Sign a petition to end forced abortion here.
http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/index.php?nav=sign_our_petition
Watch a video about forced abortion in China here.
Stop Forced Abortion – China’s War on Women! Video (4 mins)
http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/?nav=stop-forced-abortion
As awful as forced abortion is, trying to force pregnant women to give birth , even if they are far too poor to provide for a child, or a pregnancy would kill them or ruin their health, or if a pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, is just as terrible .
Robert:
What in God’s name are you talking about??? This is about women who WANT their babies and have them torn from their wombs by a barbaric regime. If you want to be a proabort apologist, that’s your business. However, try some cognitive coherence by sticking to the matter at hand.
Mr. Berger,
No one is forcing anything on anyone. When a doctor refuses to intervene and perform a homicide on an unborn child, he is not forcing a woman to give birth, he is merely letting nature take its course. It is not a terrible thing, to refuse to perform a homicide.
Well said, Melissa.