Much talk has been swirling of late regarding whether or not Pope Francis will add women to the College of Cardinals in an effort to give women a greater voice in the Church. It’s an old idea that has been mentioned during other papacies, but never acted upon. It is a course of action that if followed will amplify the din that already grips a Church that has never suffered from women who are either inaudible or not influential. To be certain, there are great women I would nominate, who would bring much to the College of Cardinals. There are many who would tear the Church asunder, setting back the role of women for decades to come.
Because the Church has reserved priestly ordination to men alone, many believe that women have lacked voice and influence in ways that directly affect the lives of women. In the wake of the feminist revolution, we do well to consider exactly what it is the feminist mothers have fought for, and what women have gained and lost over the past half-century. On the positive side, women have gained the ability to be as educated as men. From Dr. Michael Kirst at Stanford University:
According to data from the Department of Education on college degrees by gender, the US college degree gap favoring women started back in 1978, when for the first time ever, more women than men earned Associate’s degrees. Five years later in 1982, women earned more bachelor’s degrees than men for the first time, and women have increased their share of bachelor’s degrees in every year since then. In another five years by 1987, women earned the majority of master’s degrees for the first time. Finally, within another decade, more women than men earned doctor’s degrees by 2006, and female domination of college degrees at every level was complete. For the current graduating class of 2013, the Department of Education estimates that women will earn 61.6% of all associate’s degrees this year, 56.7% of all bachelor’s degrees, 59.9% of all master’s degrees, and 51.6% of all doctor’s degrees. Overall, 140 women will graduate with a college degree at some level this year for every 100 men. The article is from AEI Ideas and is summarized by Carnegie Foundation.. – See more at: http://collegepuzzle.stanford.edu/?p=3131#sthash.3DK2jRoT.dpuf
That women are doing so well is great cause for celebration. However, the feminist mothers have sold college women on a sexual revolution that has left more than 50% of young women riddled with sexually transmitted diseases, and the lie that tens of millions of abortions were the price to pay for those coveted diplomas when the contraception failed. Would that the lies and destruction ended on graduation day. However, with the american academy having become a boot camp for training in radical egalitarianism, an egalitarianism that sees the Magisterium of the Catholic Church as vilely and cruelly anachronistic, our young women bring into their young adult lives a perspective that is warped beyond belief.
So who would these women cardinals be? What would be the litmus test for their selection? Would the Pope choose women who already are on board with the magisterium? If so, there are countless thousands of women who would fill the role splendidly. If he is looking for women who are academics, a few names pop to mind readily. But such a selection begs the question; If the pope is going to select women who abide and reflect the role of women as articulated so beautifully by Pope John Paul II in Mulieris Dignitatem , then is he only seeking women who will reaffirm what has already been taught? How will that sit with the “progressive” women in the Church? What will that do to draw them in?
Or, perhaps the pope would appoint women from across the spectrum of ideology and degrees of fidelity to church teaching? But then, is that the role of the College of Cardinals? Would the pope be elevating the feminist war to a level it has no place occupying in the life of the Church? Would he do better to appoint a pontifical commission of women who represent a cross-section of thought and lifestyle if he wants to further develop the theology of women so well articulated by John Paul?
The women’s issues are as caustic and partisan as any, and radical feminism has utterly destroyed the family and western civilization. If the Pope selects these women as advisors it will do unimaginable harm. If he doesn’t select them, he will cement for them the perception that they, the ones who clamor most for a voice in the church, have none.
Before pushing ahead with a need to develop a theology of women, we should recall that Francis has inherited a wealth of such teaching from his predecessors. Most who believe that the Church has ignored the issue are in fact ignorant of how much the Church, especially in the twentieth century, has addressed the issue. When they do hear it, the message is not to the liking of many, hence the need for a new, or relevant teaching.
Then there is the untidy matter of reserving priestly ordination to men alone, a teaching that John Paul nailed shut in his Apostolic Letter, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis:
4. Although the teaching that priestly ordination is to be reserved to men alone has been preserved by the constant and universal Tradition of the Church and firmly taught by the Magisterium in its more recent documents, at the present time in some places it is nonetheless considered still open to debate, or the Church’s judgment that women are not to be admitted to ordination is considered to have a merely disciplinary force.
Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.
So, claiming that people doubted the ordinary magisterium (which is enough to end debate), John Paul invoked the extraordinary magisterium, and elevated the issue as a matter of defined teaching.
Case closed.
Until feminist cardinals declare otherwise.
Much of the work of the College of Cardinals involves matters of governing priests and bishops. Setting women in authority over the bishops could very well open a back door to matters of episcopal authority and governance, blurring lines of authority and the distinct roles of men and women in the church.
It’s a bad idea.
In my writing and pro-life work, I have met hundreds of women who would make excellent papal advisors, women who do not make the mistake of conflating equal roles with equal dignity. They wouldn’t want to be cardinals, and would rebuke such an idea. If Francis wants to alienate the women on the left, he will do so by choosing only women from the orthodox right.
If Francis wants to lose the orthodox right, all he needs to do is elevate radical feminism by elevating women on the left.
If he wants all-out-war, elevate both.
If priestly ordination is reserved to men alone, and if this is part of God’s design, then the process of selecting the new Bishop of Rome should be left to the apostolic successors in the College of Cardinals. Similarly, the governance of priests and bishops needs to be reserved to the apostolic successors alone.
We don’t need to fight the sexual revolution any more than we already have. We need to begin cleaning up the horrific mess in the scores of millions of broken lives from its battles. We need healing, not the opening of another front in the war.
UPDATE: Elizabeth Scalia made the following comment on the FB thread for this blog…
My biggest concern about this — well, I have a couple — although in theory there is nothing to prevent this, my concerns are twofold: 1) it would be awful beyond words if the next papal conclave became all about the women, and the women’s questions, and is it enough for women to be cardinals and what about the women, and the women, and the women, and the women, and it would take emphasis off of Christ, Peter, the Holy Spirit and so forth and place it all upon the idol of feminism. And of course, in terms of media, that is precisely what will happen. 2) I fear that all of the myriad ways that women are powerful witnesses and servants — and have been FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE CHURCH — will become minimized and deemphasized because the female cardinalate will be the be-all-end-all for too many. “Oh, Mother Antonia? Who is she? Not a Cardinal? Doesn’t have a PhD? Pheh. What could she possibly say to us? That would be a crime.
Good points. Almost by definition, any woman who would aspire to a cardinal’s office doesn’t deserve to receive it, and should look to what she is doing to build up her own home and community. As a home educating mother, all I want from the pope is a firm backup for my authority in the home, protection from divorce, and respect for the moral and intellectual foundation I am giving my individual children. Given that plutocrats are using Brave New World as a blueprint, this affirmation is the most needed recognition for most every woman. As taxpayers, we’re tired of paying for other women’s child care and government schools, but as Catholics, we’re even more tired of seeing the ravages this absentee motherism has wreaked on society. (That would also include you, Ms. ultra-orthodox Catholic PhD-with a blog or radio show who’s got to raise money to pay back those student loans you thoughtlessly subscribed to.)
In this issue of who has and who has not influence, being a mystic, I regret the assumption that all influence comes through voice. Comes through putting one’s hand up and asserting oneself. I’m one who believe that the one “gift” (or not so much a gift) of the feminist movement is that women learned to assert themselves. (I’m also one that does not believe that this is about egalitarianism, but suppression of the male voice.)
There are none, it seems, who honor the role of the silent. Those who stand by the side and observe. And pray. And hold the space of God in the congregation by being absolutely silent.
All of us, it seems, value only the active in our culture. The passive are seen to be useless. And are very much unwanted in terms of “leadership” in the church.
Fr. Benedict Groeschel and Cardinal Timothy Dolan were recounting a story that went around Rome:
Apparently one of Pope John Paul II’s advisors said to him, “you know, Mother Teresa would make a great Cardinal. You ought to appoint her to the College of Cardinals.”
“I already asked her,” said the Pope. “She said ‘no’.”
Mark Shea has the link.
The Popes have been naming male bishops from a variety of theological and spiritual backgrounds who have had a mixed success rate around the world. A college of cardinals that represents the actual Church as it is just as St Catherine of Siena exercised her priestly baptismal charism to tell His Holiness to get his temper in line and his papal bull back to Rome. from exile. St Joan of Arc at 19 acted on Divine private revelation to sort out the French Kingdom
“I am the handmaid of The Lord. Be it done unto me according to thy word…”
“Mary has chosen the better part.”
“Who touched me?”
“I am the handmaid….
Church teaching that begins with embracing feminism as truth diminishes the perfection of our humble servant mother Mary and the women of the New Testament. The Mother of God teaches us more about holy relationship than a Secularist mindset.
Will someone help me with this: I was once told by a philosophy professor at Boston College that my statement, “I don’t mind being subordinate” was STUPID. Perhaps he misunderstood what I meant . . . I meant I don’t mind “serving” . . . The miracle of God’s creation is His plan for male and female to join, thus fulfilling their respective roles . . . that is how we serve . . .
Pope Francis, if you want to help women, please tell the American bishops to stop nullifying marriages. That would increase marriage security for all women, enabling them to be builders of the domestic church. And at the same time, relieving taxpayers from having to support the divorce-industrial complex which is nuking the family as we know it and building up Big Gov.
I’m fine with women not being priests, bishops, or cardinals for several reasons. I understand the role of the priest in the Mass and a woman in that role would diminish the meaning there–not because women are inferior, but because as it says in Corinthians “different gifts, but the same spirit.” not everyone is to do the SAME thing. Women have so many other ways of serving. We don’t need to be priests, or bishops, or popes to serve. Instead of harping on equality, why don’t we work on building up the Kingdom?
a good and honest christian idea. it will happen. reality of the sacrament of baptism will be made true truly. Why should men hold such a monopoly over the sharing of the power?
She who rocks the cradle rules the world. Real women raise babies and teach them to know, love, and serve God..
Just a warning for blessed Roman Catholics: take out a stop-watch and time the minutes it took for the Episcopal Church to go from ordaining women provisionally (the process for which, in truth, was never completed) to mandating that no-one, no priest, no congregant could look upon a woman’s ordination as invalid. And now, of course, the TEC calls Saint Paul an abuser for healing a mad woman (stripped her of her creativity), thinks that perhaps mentioned Jesus in a sermon might improve pew numbers, and allows things like a performance of the Vagina Monologues as a valid church service.